Purchasing car insurance in Australia is one of those adult choices that can change your budget more than you expect. The question of choosing third party or comprehensive cover is not only about price. It is about what risks you want managed for you, how you use the car, and what you can afford if something goes wrong.
This article explains the real differences between third party and comprehensive car insurance in practical terms, shows representative costs with data and state-level context and gives clear examples so you can choose the right cover for your situation
This article draws on regulator guides, industry reports, and large market quote studies to build a practical comparison you can use when shopping for insurance in Australia. Key sources are MoneySmart, the Insurance Council, and recent market analysis from consumer research firms.
1. What do third party and comprehensive policies actually cover
- Third party property damageThird party property damage covers damage you cause to other people's vehicles, fences, buildings, or other property. It does not cover damage to your own vehicle. You remain financially responsible for repairing or replacing your own car unless you purchase an additional product that adds fire and theft cover.
- Third party property damage, fire, and theft This option is third party property damage with an additional layer that will pay for your car if it is stolen or damaged by fire. It still does not cover your vehicle after most accident scenarios where you are the driver at fault.
- Compulsory third party, also known as CTPCompulsory third party insurance protects other people if they are injured in a crash you cause. This is mandatory and is often bundled into your vehicle registration in most states. CTP does not pay for vehicle damage. It addresses personal injury medical costs, rehabilitation, and, where applicable, compensation claims. The rules and how CTP is managed differently by jurisdiction, so check your state regulator for exact arrangements.
- Comprehensive cover Comprehensive car insurance covers damage to your own vehicle as well as damage you cause to other vehicles or property, depending on the policy wording. Comprehensive policies typically include theft and weather and fire related damage and often include optional extras such as new car replacement, hire car after an accident, and agreed value cover. Comprehensive is the broadest form of private motor insurance in the market.
2. The simple comparison table for quick reference
Below is a simple table you can use to compare the main features of each policy type:
3. Cost direction and representative numbers
Insurance premiums depend on many factors. The same car insured under third party cover and comprehensive cover will usually show a large price difference because comprehensive pays for many more risk outcomes.
Representative national level analysis from market researchers shows that average comprehensive premiums in recent market studies fall into a broad range from roughly seventeen hundred dollars to over twenty seven hundred dollars per year, subject to driver profile, vehicle model, and postcode.
Third party and third party fire and theft products are significantly cheaper in most cases, but the precise saving depends on the insurer and product design.
Important contextual points about cost
- The younger the policy holder and the higher the annual kilometers, the higher the premium tends to be
- Postcode matters a lot because theft and accident frequency vary by suburb and state
- Optional extras such as agreed value and new car replacement add materially to the premium
- Excess choice and multi policy discounts change the headline price
4. Why people still choose third party cover
- Affordability is the main reason. If the car is low value, the cost to insure it comprehensively can be a significant portion of the vehicle's market value
- Many drivers use very old vehicles as second cars or for occasional use and accept that they will self insure for damage to their own car
- In some regional areas repair costs may be lower and the perceived benefit of comprehensive cover is smaller
Example one
A twenty year old small hatchback worth around two thousand dollars may cost four to six hundred dollars a year for third party property damage, whereas comprehensive cover for the same vehicle may cost five to eight hundred dollars or more, making third party a rational choice for the owner
5. Why people choose comprehensive cover
- Comprehensive protects you against the cost of repairing or replacing your own vehicle after an accident even if you are the driver at fault
- It often includes weather, theft, and vandalism cover and sometimes offers extras like new car replacement for vehicles below a specified age
- Comprehensive reduces the personal financial shock that can follow a serious accident
Example two
A family with a seven year old medium sedan worth twenty five thousand dollars is likely to prefer comprehensive coverage because repairing or replacing the vehicle out of pocket would be a major financial burden.
Even if comprehensive adds several hundred dollars a year the reduced risk of a catastrophic out of pocket bill makes the coverage worthwhile
6. How third party options interact with compulsory third party
- Compulsory third party or CTP, is separate from private comprehensive or third party property damage cover
- CTP protects other people for personal injury and is mandatory in every state and territory
- If you choose third party property damage or comprehensive for your motor insurance, you still must satisfy the CTP requirements for your vehicle registration
Understanding that these layers are separate is crucial because paying for third party property damage does not mean you are not liable for an injured person's medical or rehabilitation costs, which are managed under the CTP framework in each state.
7. Practical cost comparison and examples using common driver profiles
The following scenarios are modeled to show typical relative premiums rather than exact quotes. Insurers price based on many granular inputs so these examples are illustrative
Scenario one: commuter with newer car
- Profile
- Owner aged 35
- Vehicle: a five year old small SUV valued at twenty-eight thousand dollars
- Annual kilometers: 18 000
- Garaged overnight in a suburban area
- Typical market outcome
- A third-party property damage quote might be in the lower range, such as three to five hundred dollars a year because it only covers damage to others' property.
- Third party property damage, fire, and theft might add another one to two hundred dollars
- Comprehensive for this profile could be between eight hundred and fifteen hundred dollars depending on postcode excess and optional extras
- Why the gap? Comprehensive pays to repair your own vehicle after accidents, which is costly relative to the narrow third party obligation
Scenario two: retired driver with older vehicle
- Profile
- Owner aged 68
- Vehicle: a ten year old sedan valued at five thousand dollars
- Annual kilometers: 8 000
- Garaged on private property
- Typical market outcome
- Third party property damage premiums could be as low as two to four hundred dollars a year if the driver's history is clean
- Comprehensive might be higher, say six to nine hundred dollars, which can be unjustifiable if the owner would prefer to self insure for damage to their own car
These scenarios show why the decision often hinges on vehicle value and personal risk tolerance rather than simple price comparison
8. Which option makes sense by vehicle value and use
- Low-value car for occasional use Third party property damage or third party fire and theft is often the rational choice
- Mid-value car used daily for commuting Comprehensive is commonly the better option because out of pocket repair costs are likely to exceed the annual premium difference
- High-value or financed car Comprehensive is typically required by lenders and is usually the only sensible option because of the high cost of repairs or replacement
9. What is not obvious until you read the product disclosure statement
- New car replacement clauses often have age and kilometre cutoffs and narrow definitions of what constitutes a total loss
- Repairer choice can matter. Some insurers require use of approved repairers, which influences how quickly repairs happen and possibly the quality of repair
- Agreed value cover can protect you from market value disputes at claim time but costs more
Always read the product disclosure statement and ask the insurer to explain exclusions before you buy. Regulator guidance emphasizes knowing what is covered and what is not.
10. Extra factors that move the premium a lot
- Age and driving history of the primary driver
- Postcode and where the car is parked overnight
- Vehicle make, model, and engine size
- Annual kilometres and declared use such as business or ride share
- Excess amount and whether you take optional extras
Market analysis of over sixty seven thousand quotes found that switching providers can often create savings in the hundreds per year, which points to the value of regular shopping around.
11. How to choose in practice step by step
- Estimate the market value of your car and compare that to the annual premium difference between comprehensive and third party options
- If your own car's replacement cost would create severe financial stress, prefer comprehensive cover
- If you drive little and the car is low value, third-party fire and theft is a sensible compromise in many cases
- Get at least three personalised quotes and compare the same cover levels excess amounts and optional extras
- Consider telematics or low-mileage options if available and appropriate for you
12. A short checklist of questions to ask your insurer
- What is the policy excess for at-fault and not at fault claims
- Does the policy include new car replacement and what are the limits and time cutoffs?
- Will my policy pay for a hire car while my car is being repaired
- Do I have the right to choose the repairer and what warranty is provided on repairs
- Are there usage restrictions such as business use or ride-share exclusions
13. Final practical advice
- For older, low-value cars third party property damage or third party fire and theft will often be the cheapest rational choice
- For financed and high value cars comprehensive is usually the right choice and may be required by your lender
- For daily commuters, mid-value cars comprehensive gives the strongest protection against a single bad accident turning into a large financial shock
- Always shop and compare annually and check the product disclosure statement for exclusions and limits
Sources and notes
- MoneySmart Australian Securities and Investments Commission Choosing car insurance guide. This is the regulator's guide to policy types and choices.
- Canstar market analysis and star ratings, which publish average comprehensive premium ranges and long-term trend analysis.
- Insurance Council of Australia motor insurance policy paper, which explains industry wide cost drivers and recommendations.
- State regulator CTP guidance for details on compulsory third party arrangements.






